Loading...

    Why wait for access?

    Get insights that generic AI tools can't provide—backed by real project outcome data.

    Your Project Risk Score

    Projects with clear requirements are 97% more likely to succeed. Know your success probability before spending R1 on development.

    May 2024 study of 600 software engineers

    Failure Pattern Detection

    Our framework detects 4 risk patterns behind 71% of project failures. Find out which ones apply to you—and how to fix them.

    Industry research on software project failures

    Industry Benchmarks

    Only 31% of projects succeed. 45% of features are never used. See where yours stands before you build the wrong thing.

    Standish Group CHAOS Report

    “Why not just use ChatGPT?”

    Fair question. Here's what makes this different.

    Q: Can't I just ask ChatGPT to write my spec?

    A: ChatGPT doesn't know what actually ships. Our framework is trained on real project outcomes—success, failure, delay patterns. It tells you what works, not what sounds good.

    Q: I already have developers. Why do I need this?

    A: 71% of project failures come from requirements, not code. Your devs build what you spec. We make sure you spec the right thing.

    Research on software project failures

    Q: Why is access limited?

    A: Each cohort contributes outcome data back to the benchmarks. We cap cohorts to ensure data quality and give early users lifetime access to improving insights.